PiSencePiSence
Back to Services
Application Security Assessments

Secure Code Analysis

Combine automated SAST with human-led secure code review to stop vulnerabilities before release.

Start Secure Review

Overview

Secure Code Analysis (SCA/Secure Code Review) examines source code to find insecure patterns, logic flaws, injection risks, insecure cryptography usage, and other issues that automated tools alone often miss. We provide prioritized, actionable fixes and suggestions for CI integration.

Why companies need secure code reviews

Finding security defects earlier reduces remediation cost and deployment risk. Code reviews also improve developer knowledge of secure patterns and enable automated checks that block risky commits.

Who should get this

Development teams, security teams integrating security into CI/CD, fintechs and any org aiming to move security left in the SDLC.

Key benefits

Catch high-impact flaws early when fixes are cheaper

Improve developer security knowledge and reduce repeated issues

Integrate SAST into CI pipelines to stop regressions

Deliver code-level remediation snippets for fast fixes

Scope — What we test

Automated SAST runs, rule tuning, false-positive triage, manual review of auth and crypto modules, input validation, deserialization logic, and insecure dependencies.

Methodology

  1. Repository access & initial SAST scan
  2. Rule tuning & false positive triage
  3. Manual review of high-risk modules
  4. Deliver code examples, unit test ideas and CI checks
  5. Close-the-loop retest after fixes

Deliverables

SAST report with triaged findings, manual review notes, prioritized remediation, code snippets and CI integration guidance (sample GitHub Actions/GitLab CI rules).

Timeline & pricing guide

Small repo: 2–4 days. Medium: 5–10 days. Pricing depends on lines of code, languages and module complexity.

Frequently asked questions

Common questions we hear before starting an assessment — click a question to reveal a short, clear answer.

Small apps: 1–5 days. Medium: 5–10 days. Complex systems: custom timeline.

We avoid destructive checks in production and schedule high-risk tests in staging when possible.

No — blackbox tests work. Source access enables deeper code review.

Yes — PoCs, prioritized fixes and developer-focused guidance are included.

Yes — retest packages validate fixes.

Executive summary, prioritized findings, PoCs and workshop walkthroughs.

Yes — mutual NDAs and secure report distribution are standard.

Java, Node.js, Python, Go, C#, Ruby, and others — we customize SAST tooling accordingly.

We provide suggested code changes; direct commits can be arranged under a managed support retainer.

Yes — we deliver CI scripts and policy rules to block high-severity findings.

Tools & integrations
Tools & backlinks that may be used for this assessment
Burp SuiteOWASP ZAPAcunetixNetsparkerPostmanInsomniaSoapUISonarQubeSnykGhidraMobSFFridaIDA ProBinary NinjaNmapOSS-Fuzz