PiSencePiSence
Infrastructure & Network Security

Enterprise Infrastructure Security Review

High-level architecture review, threat modelling and strategic remediation planning for large estates.

Overview

This engagement focuses on architecture-level risks: trust boundaries, segmentation, critical data flows and single points of failure. We combine workshops, diagrams and security reviews to produce a prioritized remediation roadmap.

Key benefits

Understand systemic risks and single points of failure

Actionable architectural improvements and segmentation plans

Roadmap for phased remediation and detection improvements

Scope — What we test

Network topology, segmentation, remote access architecture, data flow mapping, backup and recovery assumptions, cloud/on-prem trust boundaries and identity architectures.

Methodology

  1. Stakeholder workshops & kick-off
  2. Asset & data-flow mapping
  3. Threat modelling and attack path analysis
  4. Remediation roadmap and prioritized quick-wins

Deliverables

Architecture review deliverable with high-level diagrams, threat-model outputs, prioritized remediation plan and recommended monitoring and detection controls.

Frequently asked questions

Common questions we hear before starting an assessment — click a question to reveal a short, clear answer.

Small apps: 1–5 days. Medium: 5–10 days. Complex systems: custom timeline.

We avoid destructive checks in production and schedule high-risk tests in staging when possible.

No — blackbox tests work. Source access enables deeper code review.

Yes — PoCs, prioritized fixes and developer-focused guidance are included.

Yes — retest packages validate fixes.

Executive summary, prioritized findings, PoCs and workshop walkthroughs.

Yes — mutual NDAs and secure report distribution are standard.

Test accounts, scope and any available docs (API/OpenAPI) are helpful.

Yes — via secure tunnels, bastion/proxy or on-prem engagements.

We map technical severity to business impact so you can fix what matters first.